Rhombic antennas were the ultimate antenna back in the Golden Age of Wireless. However, building one required a large tract of land and a lot of telephone poles, because they have dimensions several times the wavelength, and back then the wavelengths in use were tens of meters and longer. These were the main antennas for point to point links through the end of World War II. Since then, log-periodic and curtain arrays have become more popular.
There isn't a lot of design and practical information available. I suspect that is because not many people needed the information, a form of "If you have to ask then you don't need to know", and practical installations varied somewhat based on the available real estate.
But now, with UHF and microwave bands using wavelengths of less than a meter, rhombics are of practical size and might be easier to build than the antennas commonly used on those bands.
At left is Figure 3.77 from Edmund Laport's textbook Radio Antenna Engineering, published in 1952 and now out of copyright and freely available, scanned and processed into PDF by Dave Platt, AE6EO.
As you can see, telephone poles are used to suspend the corners of the rhombus, and this could occupy a lot of real estate when each leg is a multiple of a wavelength on the order of 20 to 160 meters. This example uses a set of three wires for increased bandwidth.
The antenna is fed with a balanced feedline at lower left apex in the image. The "terminal dissipation line" is basically a non-inductive resistor joining the lines at the far apex. The antenna is unidirectional in the direction away from the feed point when terminated this way with a resistance of 600 to 800 Ω,
As for the details, well, it depends. The gain and impedance depend on the length L and diameter of the legs and the angles φ and A defining the overall shape and dimensions. The ARRL Handbook for 1936 briefly described this antenna design using single wires for each leg and suggesting the choices of dimensions and shapes in the below table. This shape is said to provide about a 2:1 range of frequencies.
| L | φ |
| 1λ | 30° |
| 2λ | 50° |
| 3λ | 57° |
| 4λ | 62° |
| 5λ | 65° |
| 6λ | 67° |
| 7λ | 68° |
| 8λ | 69° |
Laport said in his book:
"From a circuital standpoint the rhombic antenna,
when terminated at the far end in its characteristic
impedance Z0, has an input impedance
which is predominantly resistive and equal
approximately to Z0.
For the three-wire type, this value is on the order
of 600 ohms, which matches well with ordinary
two-wire balanced feeders.
After construction the input impedance should be
measured and the feeder impedance matched to
the measured value.
[....]
When used for receiving, the terminal resistance for a
unidirectional system is usually installed directly
at the far end in the form of a non-inductive
resistor.
[....]
For medium- and high-power transmitting purposes, the
terminal resistance is almost always a balanced
lossy line of high dissipation capacity."
There hasn't been a lot of information about rhombic antennas in either the professional or amateur radio publications. QST and QEX magazines carried, with one exception, just the following articles about rhombic construction since 1940 (plus a few about historical antenna installations, like the Voice of America transmitter site north of Cincinnati, or the W6AM antenna farm). Going backwards in time:
Then there is the dual rhomboid antenna. This seems to have been first described in "Dual Rhombic for VHF-UHF", Bill Parker, W8DMR, 73 magazine, Aug 1977. Dayton Johnson, W0OZI, built an antenna for the 1296 MHz (23 cm) band based on Parker's design. Johnson's specific design was then described in the column "The World Above 50 MHz", Emil Pocock, W3EP, QST, March 1997, pp 89-90.
|
The design consists of two rhomboids with legs of uneven length, overlaid as mirror images about a central axis. Each is terminated with a 600Ω non-inductive resistor for a net feed resistance of 300Ω, a nice match to commonly available (for now!) television twin-lead.
The QST article gave dimensions in inches for a 1296 MHz design. Here are those dimensions plus both centimeters (for construction) and wavelengths (for scaling to other frequencies):
| in | cm | λ | |
| A | 30.5 | 77.5 | 3.348 |
| B | 42.5 | 108.0 | 4.666 |
| C | 12.0 | 30.5 | 1.318 |
| L1 | 27.5 | 69.9 | 3.007 |
| L2 | 50.0 | 127.0 | 5.487 |
| L3 | 77.0 | 195.6 | 8.451 |
The two short legs and two long legs are not precisely equal.
The lengths of the segments in wavelengths at 1296.1 MHz are:
3.45λ
5.91λ
5.96λ
3.40λ
The result for 1296 MHz is a fairly simple antenna with non-critical dimensions and a claimed gain of about 20 dB over a dipole!
The overall size is quite manageable, about 196×108 cm.
It could be fed with 300Ω balanced line leading to a half-wave balun built from 75Ω coax, transforming the 300Ω balanced to 75Ω unbalanced. Cheap 75Ω coaxial cable could be used all the way to the transceiver or transverter, or a quarter-wave matching transformer used to convert that to 50Ω.
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
| © Bob Cromwell Aug 2010. Created with /bin/vi and ImageMagick, hosted on OpenBSD with Apache. Root password available here, privacy policy here. |